Student’s failing Bible-based essay on gender won’t affect final grade

A University of Oklahoma student’s final grade won’t be affected after she controversially flunked a Bible-based essay on gender that was assigned by a trans instructor — triggering widespread backlash.

Samantha Fulnecky, 20, filed a discrimination complaint with the school last week after she was given an F for arguing in her psychology class paper that “belief in multiple genders” was “demonic.”

The school has since revealed the failing grade will have no bearing on Fulnecky’s academic standing after the course’s professor, Mel Curth, was placed on leave and administrators launched a probe into the junior’s complaint.

The controversial assignment was supposed to account for 3% of Fulnecky’s final grade.

For the assignment, Curth — a transgender grad student who uses “she/they” pronouns — had asked students to pen a 650-word response to an academic article that weighed whether conformity with gender norms was associated with popularity or bullying among middle school students.

In her essay, Fulnecky noted she was frustrated by the premise of the study because she doesn’t believe that there are more than two genders based on her understanding of the Bible.

“Society pushing the lie that there are multiple genders and everyone should be whatever they want to be is demonic and severely harms American youth,” she wrote, adding that promoting the belief in multiple genders would lead society to move “farther from God’s original plan for humans.”

“I live my life based on this truth and firmly believe that there would be less gender issues and insecurities in children if they were raised knowing that they do not belong to themselves, but they belong to the Lord.”

Fulnecky received zero points for her paper.

The instructor noted that they failed the psych major on the grounds that she neglected to address the prompt and relied more on “personal ideology” than “empirical evidence.”

“Please note that I am not deducting points because you have certain beliefs,” the instructor wrote in feedback, adding that the paper did “not answer the questions for the assignment.”

Curth doubled down, arguing Fulnecky’s paper “contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence in a scientific class, and is at times offensive.”

“To call an entire group of people ‘demonic’ is highly offensive, especially a minoritized population,” Curth wrote before urging the student to try to “apply some more perspective and empathy” in her work moving forward.”

The feedback and failing grade ignited a viral firestorm after the school’s chapter of Turning Point USA blasted out the news on social media.

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt was among those to weigh in, posting on X that the situation was “deeply concerning.”

“I’m calling on the OU regents to review the results of the investigation & ensure other students aren’t unfairly penalized for their beliefs,” he said.

As the backlash continued to mount, the school confirmed it had launched an investigation into the student’s discrimination claims.

“The University of Oklahoma takes seriously concerns involving First Amendment rights, certainly including religious freedoms,” the university said in a statement.

“OU remains firmly committed to fairness, respect and protecting every student’s right to express sincerely held religious beliefs.”

The instructor, meanwhile, will remain on leave for the rest of the semester.

“The graduate student instructor has been placed on administrative leave pending the finalization of this process,” the university said.

“To ensure fairness in the process, a full-time professor is serving as the course instructor for the remainder of the semester.”