Dems at a loss to stop Trump, ending states’ Medicaid scams and other commentary

From the right: Dems at a Loss To Stop Trump

Democrats today are “engaged in bitter infighting and struggling to come up with a unified strategy to oppose Trump,” observes The Washington Times’ Byron York. Meanwhile, Trump is “setting the agenda” and “putting together one of the most consequential presidencies in years.” Lacking the Russia-collusion narrative “to use as a cudgel against the Trump administration,” Democrats are relying instead on “lawfare” to thwart him and using “1960s-style civil disobedience” tactics as symbols of “resistance.” Yet “Democrats are still on the wrong side of a number of issues, like immigration, wokeism, and national security.” Indeed, Democratic Socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani “is a walking nightmare for Democrats who hope to win back voter support nationally.”

Budget hawk: Ending States’ Medicaid Scams

“The House version of the ‘one big beautiful bill’ started to clean up a financing scheme that lets states abuse the Medicaid program for extra money,” cheers Red Jahncke at The Wall Street Journal. And “the Senate version is poised to finish the job.” The scheme entails states taxing providers (mainly hospitals) and then returning the tax via a “supplemental payment” that triggers federal matching funds. Both the House and Senate set a moratorium on new and higher provider taxes, but the Senate would lower them, producing “major savings” and a “sorely needed” trim in Medicaid enrollment. “Government programs should be straightforward, transparent and cost-effective. The provider tax scheme is the opposite.” Senate reforms would both “save money” and “move states in the direction of good government.”

Conservative: Social Security Is Already Broke

The Social Security trustees “warn that by 2033” the program “won’t have the money to pay retirees’ full benefits,” but, in fact, it “already doesn’t have the money,” argues Merrill Matthews at The Hill. The program’s “trust fund boasts some $2.5 trillion in assets,” but it must tap into that cash to pay out benefits, since it doles out more than it brings in. Plus, “that $2.5 trillion isn’t invested in stocks or bonds or loaned out to interest-paying banks or companies. The federal government has borrowed that money and spent it, writing itself interest-bearing IOUs.” Meaning, in order to pay out benefits, the government is “creating new debt to pay old debt.” The trust fund “is already essentially, if not technically, depleted.”

Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post’s signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!

Foreign desk: Pooh-Poohing the Strikes on Iran

“There’s a debate raging right now about the effectiveness of the strikes that Israel and the U.S. inflicted on Iran,” stemming from a CNN article that claimed they failed to destroy Tehran’s nuclear sites, notes PJ Media’s Chris Queen. “It’s all an effort to discredit President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pet Hegseth.” The piece, for starters, was based on “unnamed sources.” And Israeli intelligence, “which is much closer to the situation,” says even if the US strike didn’t totally obliterate Iran’s nuclear program, it set the Islamic Republic back “several years.” Note, too, adds Queen, that one of the reporters on the CNN piece was Natasha Bertrand, who pushed the false “claim that the New York Post report about Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation.”

Culture beat: Population Growth Is Ending

“People are having fewer children — much fewer,” reports Bill King at RealClear Politics. And so, while many have long assumed the global population will keep growing, the United Nations just “lowered its global population projections” — the “demographic math has changed.” And remember that population projections matter greatly, because they shape “everything from how we plan cities to how we fund pensions”; if they’re “off by a billion people,” that’s not just a rounding error. It’s a seismic shift in the underlying math of the future.” Still, “the data clearly indicate” that the era of continuing growth “is rapidly coming to a close. “What follows, and how we react to it, is one of the most critical and least understood stories of our time.”

— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board